This page sponsored by Mr. S Leather, San Francisco    [other banners]

	SD! : Web boards : Ritual : "burkhas for slaves" 1 2 3 4 5 burkhas for slaves (42) Mon 14 Jan 08, 9:57 PM 000-719-381 US(OK), 7 yrs Y! Reading the recent discussion of slave clothing (or none) and choice (or non-choice) thereof, this slut had a fantasy of its Master/Owner always requiring it to wear a burka when out of the house as counterpoint to always being naked (except for collar, restraints, chains) when indoors. Outdoors, this piece of clothing would cover the naked slave underneath, cover its collars and piercings, markings and shackles from public view, and fully objectify it in the eyes of all observers. this slut readily acknowledges that this piece of clothing to Westerners symbolizes a discriminatory and sexist image of a subordinate Muslim woman and so is viewed very negatively by "enlightened" Westerners. But a slave is an object, owned, without rights, property of its Owner assuming this status by voluntary surrender, not from societal norms or political oppression. this slut finds the juxtaposition of nudity underneath and total coverage before the outside world, as an Owned slave, to be a very powerful and erotic image. What do Masters or Mistresses and sister slaves think of this "dress code"? submitted respectfully slut phylassia 00-719-381 Edited Mon 14 Jan 08, 9:59 PM by 000-719-381 15 Jan 08, 12:37 AM 702-688-374 US, 2 yrs Not wanting to offend but... I don't like this idea. Yes, it's a free country and all, but why stir up trouble by adopting a very unpopular symbol just for the hell of it? I can see it now...more reasons to slam Muslims and increase the dislike in our streets. 15 Jan 08, 12:48 AM 721-024-085 US, 13 mths I think there would have to be some careful thought into which style of the burqa was chosen. The material of the burqas and other traditional clothing I've seen seems like light material that might show nipple piercings if you were naked underneath. I actually find burqas and other traditional clothing quite pretty in their own right. Last time I was in the UAE I thought some of them were prettier than the western clothing that I had on! In practice I'm not sure how pleasant this might be in the western world. Wearing one might lead to getting harassed unfortunately; at the least a lot of attention, gawking, and lot of questions. Really depends on how noticeable you and your owner want to be, which is all personal preference. Edited 15 Jan 08, 2:59 PM by 721-024-085 15 Jan 08, 2:20 AM shedragon US(VA), 15 mths Y! I guess it depends on the area in which you live. Around here people dress in a wide variety of ways, whether it is military uniforms, business suits, emo and goth garb, saris, sarongs or any other kind of ethnic, fashion or trendy clothing. You wouldn't stand out here. And I think it would be nice to have that kind of airy coverage over my naked body, with only Master knowing what was underneath. It is better to remain uncollared than to be led by the wrong leash. 15 Jan 08, 6:17 AM BrutalAntipathy 23 mths Wreckwium wrote: It works well with a brown-eyed slave, but causes comment with a blue-eyed one. Colored contacts might help there. And for the record, I absolutely love the idea. L is laying here worrying that I am going to throw away all her clothes. I'll try being nicer if you try being smarter. 15 Jan 08, 6:25 AM 862-203-011 AU, 23 mths BrutalAntipathy wrote: And for the record, I absolutely love the idea. L is laying here worrying that I am going to throw away all her clothes. Considering the climate, that may not be irrational fear Master's piece 15 Jan 08, 6:30 AM DaS_13 US, 16 mths Ooo! I love this idea. I have for quite a while now. When I first told Clover about it, she didn't like it very much, because she loves wearing cute clothing like t-shirts and jeans. And although I have to admit I love seeing her in them, this look would be so submissive. I'm sure she thinks I have forgotten this type of outfit, so I think I am going to bring it up tonight! Thanks! Edit: Do you (or anyone) know a good website to buy them? Thank you! Edit 2: I also love Sari's! I think they are beautiful and very submissive as well. Owner of Clover - Slave number: 465-186-919. Edited 15 Jan 08, 6:40 AM by DaS_13 15 Jan 08, 2:10 PM 000-719-381 US(OK), 7 yrs Y! his_zina wrote: Not wanting to offend but... I don't like this idea. Yes, it's a free country and all, but why stir up trouble by adopting a very unpopular symbol just for the hell of it? I can see it now...more reasons to slam Muslims and increase the dislike in our streets. With all respect, this idea is not meant to "stir up trouble" or certainly to give reason(s) "to slam Muslims" or "increase dislike." The fact that this attire is seen culturally as a sign of subservience and submission is part of its appeal to this slut; but its wearing by an owned slave in this context is a symbol not of oppression but of voluntary surrender and being owned by choice. The juxtaposition of nudity and restraints and body modifications underneath with a total body covering outside signifies the slave as being both totally owned and totally off-limits to all but its Owner. The fact that to wear such attire in a Western city might subject the slave to stares and derision increases the humiliation factor for this slave and reinforces its status as its Owner's property. most respectfully 000-719-381 on my knees 15 Jan 08, 2:18 PM 000-719-381 US(OK), 7 yrs Y! DaS_13 wrote: Edit: Do you (or anyone) know a good website to buy them? Thank you! this slut has found an online site: www.alhannah.com. mailing address is: 65 Rocky Hill Avenue New Britain CT 06051 USA phone: (860) 229-3838 An Afgahni style burka (or chador) made in Pakistan is listed at $35.99. (this slut has not purchased any items from this site.) Think of all the clothing costs You could save instead of those "cute" outfits of t-shirts and jeans Your slave enjoys . . . submitted most respectfully 000-719-381 on my knees 15 Jan 08, 3:07 PM Gavriel US, 2 yrs 000-719-381 wrote: The fact that this attire is seen culturally as a sign of subservience and submission is part of its appeal to this slut; but its wearing by an owned slave in this context is a symbol not of oppression but of voluntary surrender and being owned by choice. The juxtaposition of nudity and restraints and body modifications underneath with a total body covering outside signifies the slave as being both totally owned and totally off-limits to all but its Owner. Unfortunately, you don't get to decide nor disavow how other people react to the symbols you display. You may like the good-luck symbolism of the Buddhist "manji" symbol, but if you wear one on your clothing people are quite reasonably going to see it as, and react to it as, a swastika. Likewise with a burkha: the symbolism that you have in your head for the garb is entirely irrelevant to the significance that other people are going to infer when they see it. You are responsible for the obviously foreseeable consequences of your choices. If you do something which you know will stir people up, claiming that stirring them up was not your intent does little to mitigate that. 15 Jan 08, 5:44 PM whoreslut_steph UK, 2 yrs £ My Owner has mentioned the idea of this several times now, fortunately for this slave there are a lot of similarly dressed people in this area so i would not look out of place; but at the same time this idea seems so foreign to me as my Owner normally wants me to dress in the skimpiest clothes he can find for me. Of course the decision would rest with him but i for one hope that he does not instruct me to dress like this as for me my body is something that i am most proud to show both for and to my Owner. Next page